Our Inspiration

Our Inspiration

Our Inspiration

The world needs more than great scientists.
It needs whole-brain thinkers.

The world needs more than great scientists.
It needs whole-brain thinkers.

Whole-Brain Engineering philosophy was developed and championed by Professor Julio Mario Ottino during his tenure as dean of Northwestern University’s McCormick School of Engineering. Conventional wisdom associates the right brain with qualitative thinking—creativity and intuition—and the left brain with quantitative thinking—analysis and mathematical reasoning. But solving the most challenging problems of our time requires both modes of thinking to work together.

Whole-Brain Engineering philosophy was developed and championed by Professor Julio Mario Ottino during his tenure as dean of Northwestern University’s McCormick School of Engineering. Conventional wisdom associates the right brain with qualitative thinking—creativity and intuition—and the left brain with quantitative thinking—analysis and mathematical reasoning. But solving the most challenging problems of our time requires both modes of thinking to work together.

Inspired by Professor Ottino’s commitment to advancing the whole-brain philosophy, we established Whole Brain Scholars (WBS) as an independent educational organization to carry this vision forward. The current education system, with its strong emphasis on memorization and quantitative deduction, is woefully inadequate in preparing students for whole-brain thinking. We believe investigative and persuasive writing provides an ideal way to unite two essential elements of the whole-brain philosophy—scientific literacy and humanistic understanding. This belief led us to launch our first Whole Brain Science Writing Competition in 2026.

Inspired by Professor Ottino’s commitment to advancing the whole-brain philosophy, we established Whole Brain Scholars (WBS) as an independent educational organization to carry this vision forward. The current education system, with its strong emphasis on memorization and quantitative deduction, is woefully inadequate in preparing students for whole-brain thinking. We believe investigative and persuasive writing provides an ideal way to unite two essential elements of the whole-brain philosophy—scientific literacy and humanistic understanding. This belief led us to launch our first Whole Brain Science Writing Competition in 2026.

This video introduces Northwestern Engineering’s Whole-Brain Engineering philosophy, bringing analytical rigor—logic, mathematics, and scientific reasoning—together with creativity, intuition, design, and imaginative problem-solving. Its message is simple: technical knowledge alone is not enough; complex problems require thinkers who can connect disciplines, approach ideas from multiple perspectives, and turn insight into action.

Professor Julio M. Ottino

Professor Julio M. Ottino

Professor Julio M. Ottino

RESEARCH AND RECOGNITION

Professor Ottino is internationally recognized for pioneering research in chaos, fluid mixing, and complex systems. His contributions have earned election to three of America’s most distinguished peer-elected academies:

Professor Ottino is internationally recognized for pioneering research in chaos, fluid mixing, and complex systems. His contributions have earned election to three of America’s most distinguished peer-elected academies:

National Academy of Sciences

National Academy of Sciences

National Academy of Sciences

National Academy of Engineering

National Academy of Engineering

National Academy of Engineering

American Academy of Arts and Sciences

American Academy of Arts and Sciences

American Academy of Arts and Sciences

EDUCATION AND LEADERSHIP

During his 18 years as dean of Northwestern Engineering, Professor Ottino made Whole-Brain Engineering a guiding philosophy for the school—strengthening technical education through design, entrepreneurship, leadership, art, and collaboration across disciplines.

ART AND IDEAS

A lifelong painter, Professor Ottino embodies whole-brain thinking in his own work. He uses visual thinking to understand and communicate complex scientific ideas, while exploring how art, technology, science, and design can strengthen one another. His books include The Nexus: Augmented Thinking for a Complex World, co-authored with designer Bruce Mau.

A lifelong painter, Professor Ottino embodies whole-brain thinking in his own work. He uses visual thinking to understand and communicate complex scientific ideas, while exploring how art, technology, science, and design can strengthen one another. His books include The Nexus: Augmented Thinking for a Complex World, co-authored with designer Bruce Mau.

Professor Ottino accepts the Bernard M. Gordon Prize for developing Whole-Brain Engineering at Northwestern. This prize is the highest U.S. honor for engineering education, with a total award of $500,000.

Our Mission

Our Mission

Our Mission

Bringing Whole Brain Thinking to Younger Generations

Bringing Whole Brain Thinking to Younger Generations

Through our global science writing competition for students who are 14–19 years old on the date they submit their essay, we aspire to cultivate students who are intellectually curious, scientifically grounded, and ambitious enough to make a positive impact on society. By inviting young people to investigate meaningful questions and develop their own ideas, we seek to prepare and guide new generations of change makers. Through writing, students learn to ask stronger questions, evaluate evidence critically, and develop well-supported answers.

Through our global science writing competition for students who are 14–19 years old on the date they submit their essay, we aspire to cultivate students who are intellectually curious, scientifically grounded, and ambitious enough to make a positive impact on society. By inviting young people to investigate meaningful questions and develop their own ideas, we seek to prepare and guide new generations of change makers. Through writing, students learn to ask stronger questions, evaluate evidence critically, and develop well-supported answers.

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) makes our mission even more urgent. AI can accelerate research, synthesis, and expression, but it also makes standardized answers easier to produce and can tempt students to outsource the very thinking that education should develop. We do not want AI to replace critical thinking or whole-brain thinking. Instead, we want the younger generation to use AI as a tool that supports inquiry, expands creativity, and accelerates learning, while curiosity, judgment, and original reasoning remain their own. Used thoughtfully, AI and whole-brain thinking should strengthen one another: technology can amplify a student’s capacity, but the student must remain the thinker.

We believe scientific thinking requires more than knowing facts. It brings rigorous analysis together with creativity, design thinking, and ideas across disciplines. Our mission is to make whole-brain thinking accessible to young people around the world and to give the next generation both the tools to think differently and a platform to make their voices heard.

We believe scientific thinking requires more than knowing facts. It brings rigorous analysis together with creativity, design thinking, and ideas across disciplines. Our mission is to make whole-brain thinking accessible to young people around the world and to give the next generation both the tools to think differently and a platform to make their voices heard.

Our Values

Our Values

Our Values

More Diverse

More Diverse

More Diverse

More Diverse

While many writing programs and competitions focus primarily on the humanities and social sciences, Whole Brain Scholars embraces a much broader range of disciplines—from the natural sciences, engineering, and mathematics to economics, psychology, philosophy, history, and beyond. We believe that students in every field can benefit from developing critical thinking skills through writing. Learning to question assumptions, evaluate evidence, construct arguments, and communicate complex ideas with clarity benefits students throughout their academic journey, regardless of their academic interests.

More Transparent

More Transparent

More Transparent

More Transparent

We are committed to a transparent judging process, with expectations clearly communicated and evaluation criteria consistently applied. Participating in a writing competition requires a significant investment of time, thought, and intellectual effort. We want to assure our students that their work will receive a fair and thorough evaluation. By making assessment less of a “black box”, we aim to help students understand not only how their work is judged, but also what rigorous and thoughtful writing looks like.

More Accessible

More Accessible

More Accessible

More Accessible

We believe that high-quality writing and research resources should be accessible to all young people, regardless of their background or access to academic networks. We are committed to sharing free, high-quality writing resources as the program grows. Each year, we will also select one outstanding competition participant as our Annual Whole Brain Scholar and sponsor the awardee’s participation in a research project with a professor or scholar at one of the world’s leading universities. Through this initiative, we hope to open doors to opportunities that might otherwise be out of reach and give them the opportunity to experience research beyond the classroom.

Our Honorary Board

Our Honorary Board

Our Honorary Board

Professional portrait of Professor Julio M. Ottino

Professor Julio M. Ottino

Professor Julio M. Ottino

Professor Julio M. Ottino

Former Dean, McCormick School of Engineering

Professor of Chemical and Biological Engineering

Professor of Kellogg School of Management

Former Dean, McCormick School of Engineering

Professor of Chemical and Biological Engineering

Professor of Kellogg School of Management

Northwestern University

Northwestern University

Professor Julio M. Ottino is a renowned engineering scientist, educator, and artist. He has authored over 260 peer-reviewed journal articles and three books, with over 27,000 citations. His seminal book, The Kinematics of Mixing, alone has been cited more than 3,500 times. His contributions have earned him election to three of America’s most distinguished peer-elected academies: the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and American Academy of Arts and Sciences. He also received the Bernard M. Gordon Prize, the highest U.S. honor in engineering education, for developing and implementing the Whole-Brain Engineering philosophy.

Professional portrait of Professor Richard M. Lueptow

Professor Richard M. Lueptow

Professor Richard M. Lueptow

Professor Richard M. Lueptow

Senior Associate Dean, McCormick School of Engineering

Professor of Mechanical Engineering

Northwestern University

Northwestern University

After earning his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from MIT, Professor Lueptow joined Northwestern University, where he has built a distinguished academic career spanning nearly four decades. His research ranges from fundamental flow physics to water purification, resulting in nearly 200 peer-reviewed journal publications and six patents. He has been elected a Fellow of the American Physical Society, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, and the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, and has received numerous honors for excellence in both research and teaching.

Our Judges

Our Judges

Our Judges

Our judging panel includes professors and scholars from Northwestern University, Harvard University, Stanford University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), University of Oxford, University of Cambridge and other leading universities, together with subject-matter experts from different industries around the world.

Working collaboratively, our judges evaluate each submission with academic rigor and an appreciation for original thinking. We look for students who ask meaningful questions, examine evidence critically, connect ideas across disciplines, and communicate their thinking clearly.

Working collaboratively, our judges evaluate each submission with academic rigor and an appreciation for original thinking. We look for students who ask meaningful questions, examine evidence critically, connect ideas across disciplines, and communicate their thinking clearly.

Academic reviewers examining written submissions together at a table